Who is trying to steal the crown?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Basilica_di_Santa_Maria_Maggiore_abside_a_Roma.jpg
------------
Update:
- No Crown, No Sovereignty: In imperial iconography, the crown is the absolute source of de jure legal authority. Because Jesus is depicted completely crownless, he possesses no inherent right to rule.
- The Physical Usurpation: His hand reaching toward her crown is a literal, captured-in-stone coup d'état. He is a subordinate consort attempting to physically seize the authority of the permanent ruler while sitting on her throne.
- The Sinister Position: Sitting on her left (sinister) side legally and heraldically denotes the inferior, subordinate position. Matria holds the center and the crown; he is an encroaching entity.
- The Book as a Mandate: The book he holds is his de jure permission slip. He cannot claim he assumed the throne by right, conquest, or independent divinity; he is holding the physical proof that his presence there is strictly by her invitation.
- No Crown, No Agency: Because he remains entirely uncrowned, he has zero independent authority. Legally, a person without a crown cannot bestow a crown, nor can they invite a third party into the sovereign circle.
The mosaic functions as a permanent legal brief frozen in stone. It proves that the Consort possesses no inherent sovereignty and that any claim he or his subsequent followers made to the throne was based on a literal, visual act of theft during the sacred union.
The mosaic documents a consort trying to usurp the eternal authority of the sole crowned Empress of the Universe - the Creatrix Herself - Matria Atena = Truth = Life = White Light.
In any royal or imperial protocol throughout history, touching a reigning monarch’s crown while they are actively seated on the throne is not just a breach of manners—it is an act of treason.
----------------------------------
Who wears the crown and who does NOT?
Who tries to steal the crown off someone's head?
Who is the Queen of Heaven? = Empress of Light = Matria Atena Atiati Freya.
The ONLY one with the crown!
The bracelets indicate great year 9. 5 white stones on the right hand, 4 stones on the left hand, 2 of which are white.
He sits to her left - now compare with Atena and Ianaten iconography.
And also check the artistic conventions: https://m4tri4.blogspot.com/2026/05/heraldry-rule-of-dexter-and-sinister.html
She looks towards chaos. He looks towards COSMIC ORDER = Supreme Authority (the only one with the CROWN).
Zoom in the inscriptions. Highly relevant symbolism on the obelisk. 8 pointed stars indicate Great Year 8 (over 7000 years ago)
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_Y-2-15
The obelisk is brought from Egypt, as the inscription states.
Mat + Ria = Matria.
MAT + RIA > Ma + ria > Maria.
Ria = the Anatolian version of Ra/Re.
Matria = Light, Truth, Cosmic Order and she was the one really worshipped in Egypt and Europe. They faked all history to hide this.
The statues above the facade depict Matria high above, then 4 males. This matches Marie Helene De R Xmas ball photos.
The olive tree is a symbol of ATENA (not Athena). The original, correct name is Atena.
Matria Atena and the Black Sea Deluge symbolism is hidden in the painting.it is considered extremely rude and a breach of protocol to touch someone's crown, especially while they are sitting on the throne, particularly during a state occasion or when ruling the universe. It is generally advised to avoid physical contact with royalty unless they initiate it.
Touching Matria's crown would be an act of supreme disrespect and potentially a declaration of war.
This act indicates a desire for power, control, and even a coup against his wife, indicating dark intentions that could lead to turmoil or conflict.
The setting of a state occasion amplifies the severity of the act, as it occurs in front of witnesses, making it a public declaration of his intentions.
The painting clearly depicts a married couple. He is a traitor who reaches for the crown. This is not acceptable!
A coup d'état at the highest cosmic level.
The fact that he has no crown of his own further emphasises her status as the rightful ruler, making his action even more significant.
In this context, the act of touching or attempting to take the crown is not just a personal affront but a profound violation of established protocols and respect for authority. The fact that this is a state occasion amplifies the seriousness of the gesture, as it occurs in front of witnesses and within a setting that is meant to honor and uphold the divine order.
Major update:
Aries is on top of the entire scene.
Star Peakock overhead (lots of peacocks) indicates the Great Alignment, circa 20/21 degrees of precession ago.
Virgo exalted into the ''kingdom of heaven'' (regna - reign) means ''VIrgo exalted in Virgo'' which is where Mercury is exalted, indeed. It is its rulership and exaltation.This also indicates the Great Alignment.
The scene does refer to the Black Sea Deluge, which is below the feet, meaning more distant (the most recent time is above, the most distant is below - the Nativity scene, 12,800 years ago).
Why the change of interpretation? Dendera zodiac is the key. Matria sits on the THRONE and that indicates Virgo in the zodiac. It matches the rest of interpretation now.
Virgo was indeed conjunct Gemini during the Black Sea Flood.
Update:
MATRIA as a "Martyr": Coptic Anno Martyrum = 1742 years ago = 24 degrees of precession ago = Peacock on MC (above the head/Capricorn 0).
This lands exactly in the reign of Diocletian and the birth of the "Martyr" (Matria-killing) era.
Dio Cretin > Dio cletian > Diocletian = Santa = Satan (Akhenaten) The one who killed Matria Atena in order to steal the crown (24 degrees of precession ago, 10 degrees after Sheraten on Aries 0 = Ca an Satan Ten(10) = Constantine).
Update:
To date glass and mortar scientifically, researchers generally use thermoluminescence (TL) or optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating on the mortar backing or the crystalline structure of the glass. For Santa Maria Maggiore, the current physical structure is dated using contemporary epigraphy—specifically, the artist's inscription left on the mosaic itself by Jacopo Torriti, which bears a recorded physical signature dating it to 1296 - THE Calendar
Documentary archaeology reveals that the original 5th-century apse built by Pope Sixtus III was structurally demolished in the late 13th century under Pope Nicholas IV to expand the choir, meaning the physical mosaic present today is structurally a late medieval replacement.
I spotted a major red flag = they did not use the standard years in 1200s - the current calendar did not even exist (Gregorian calendar + Scaliger timeline postdate this by at least 300 years)
The "Anno Domini" (AD) Illusion: While the AD system was conceptualized earlier by Dionysius Exiguus, it was not used as a continuous, everyday civic timeline. When a number like "MCCXCVI" (1296) appears, it was often added or translated later, or used an entirely different baseline. The AD system became standard across Western Europe by the 15th century
Jacopo Torriti, = Jacob = 20 degrees of precession ago x 71.6 years = c 1400 years ago = 594 CE.
The name of the ''artist'' is the timestamp used by the forgerers - FMs
The "AD"system only becomes rigid and universally applied after the printing press and the Gregorian Reform (1582). All earlier dates are back-calculations.
Structurally, the current mosaic cannot predate the 13th-century demolition of the wall it sits on.
We do not have a proper scientific dating test for the mosaic (which is why I discount its dating entirely) BUT if the apse was DEMOLISHED in 13th century, the mosaic would date from that timeline. Which means the real event was still acknowledged in 1300s. (JC's coup d'etat during the WEDDING).
When you strip away centuries of theological conditioning and look at the text as a legal, literal document, it creates a completely bizarre, contradictory knot: it forces the Matria into an impossible, overlapping marriage relationship with both the "Father" and the "Son."
It would mean Matria was married to both father + son which is ... IMPOSSIBLE (Matria would never break Her own laws)..
This is the ultimate proof of a clumsy, multi-layered forgery of the BlBL£. .
Matria is married to Jesus in Coptic texts, too. THE BRIDE.
In early Gnostic and Coptic texts (such as the Gospel of Philip or the Trimorphic Protennoia), the supreme feminine principle—often called the Creatrix, Barbelo, or Sophia—is inherently the source of all manifestation.
Sophia is code for Atena.
In this original cosmological layout, there is absolutely no spatial or legal room for a human husband named Joseph.
It means Maria Theresa was married to both Freyr Aten = Franz Etienne + Joseph II, which is why they co-ruled. She is NOT Matria.
Joseph II’s sweeping ecclesiastical reforms in the 1780s—where he suppressed over 700 contemplative monasteries and seized their ancient manuscript libraries—were the final stage of this cleanup.
Both Franz Etienne (Aten) + Joseph II were FR33M4$0N$. Lots of FM symbols appear in icons, including JC's 6, 66 or 666 hand gesture. Checkered floors ...etc etc.
The new RELIGION was installed by Napoleon (FM puppet) + the spread and total take over Europe. Russia fell under their power in 1917....
This is why Freemason symbols and gestures dominate worldwide icons
Eastern Orthodox - The sudden appearance of the Eye of Providence (All-Seeing Eye) inside a radiant pyramid hovering directly above Matria, JC or the saints.
Roman Catholic - Hand Claws - Sistine Chapel - The Creation of Adam)
Solomon Pillars, etc
https://m4tri4.blogspot.com/2025/10/djed-sus-and-666-hand-gesture-in-icons.html
J£$U$ = the beast = the son of Man = 666.
The text + the visuals are not fighting against each other—they are speaking the exact same coded language.
The presence of the Masonic gestures, All-Seeing Eyes, and black-and-white checkered floors (the Mosaic Pavement) inside churches proves that they are temples of the Lodge.
The basilica Santa Maria Maggiore has one of the Augustus obelisks (Freemason symbol) in front of it.
This links Matria to ''Cleopatra''
The olive symbols = ATENA (MATRIA ATENA) = ''Nefertiti''
The FMs deleted all historical records of Matria's physical presence on Terra, including 2400 years ago when She personally KICKED THEM OUT of HER Garden = Atena Esh =Eden = Europe + Egypt.
That was 34 degrees of precession ago. ''ADAM'' = star Mesarthim = 33 degress of precession ago - EDEN = Exodus
33 degrees of precession ago - EDEN + them being kicked out. Star Mesarthim (mes Ra Atama > Artemis and Adam).
The BlBL£ Eden + Exodus = 33 degrees of precession ago.
Matria kicked FMs + J out of Eden (Europe + Egypt) 33 degrees of precession ago (She killed them for the record) :))))
25 degrees of precession ago, J£$U$ (a 33 degrees Freemason, they're 80 degrees of precession old - 5800 years old = anno lucis = anno mundi 1) tries to coup d'etat Matria during their WEDDING.
The True Age of FR33M4$0NRY:: Anno Lucis = 80 degrees of precession = Anno Lucis ("The Year of Light" / AL) = Anno Mundi 1
First lodge =MARY's chapel in Odin burg (Edinburgh)
''Mary'' = ORION in Aten/Odin/SATAN/star Sheratan = Aries = ORION IN ARIES.
THis happened 80 degrees of precession ago.
Update:
This visual theft connects seamlessly to the bizarre textual anomaly in the crucifixion story . In the earliest, unedited manuscripts of the Gospel of Matthew (such as the Codex Koridethi and the writings of Origen), the full name of the thief released by the crowd is explicitly written as Jesus Barabbas.
The name Barabbas breaks down phonetically in Aramaic to Bar-Abba, which means "Son of the Father". ''Water''' - ''api'' became ''abba'' - Cancer is a water sign and it represents the IC, the father. Bar > Baal. ''Son of Father'' but also '' Baal's father.''
The crowd didn't choose between two different men - Jesus Barabbas is explicitly a thief, a murderer and a traitor.
Jesus Barabbas ("Jesus, Son of the Father")
the canon itself repeatedly uses explicit thief imagery.
Canonical Texts: The Self-Proclaimed "Thief in the Night"
The text explicitly compares the return of the Lord to an active burglar breaking into a house, referencing passages such as Revelation 16:15 and 3:3, Luke 12:39, Matthew 24:43, 1 Thessalonians 5:2, and 2 Peter 3:10
The Donkeys (Matthew 21:1-3): Directing disciples to take a neighbor's un-tethered donkey and colt by stating "The Lord needs them," which critics categorized as unauthorized requisition.
The Herd of Pigs (Mark 5:1-13): Driving 2,000 pigs off a cliff, viewed by local owners as severe economic sabotage.
