Black Sea's Snake Island

 The data:

Snake Island, known as "Insula Șerpilor" in Romanian, has a historical connection to the legend of Achilles, the ancient Greek hero. According to some interpretations of Greek mythology, Snake Island is thought to be linked to the story of Achilles and the Trojan War.

One of the legends suggests that the island was named after the mythological figure of Achilles, who was said to have been buried there or had some connection to the island. Additionally, the island is sometimes associated with the myth of the Argonauts, who were said to have encountered various challenges during their quest for the Golden Fleece, including encounters with serpents.

 

The interpretation: 

 In fact, Terra = hell, inhabited by snakes or other reptiles. The name of the planet itself implies reptiles, land crawlers.


Update: 

In Ovid's Metamorphoses, the Trojan War follows the flood.The narrative structure of the Metamorphoses generally follows a chronological order, moving from the earliest events (creation and the flood) to later events (the Trojan War). 

This places the Trojan war over 7,500 years ago. This means the Snake Island was already an island over 7.500 years ago, when Ovid's narration ends. 

The Snake Island of the Black Sea is 45 km away from Romania's shores. 

Later Romanian folklore mentions the temple under the name of “Church with 9 altars”  - NOAH, Great Year 9

https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/450/856


Well, the most important thing is that Snake Island was already an island over 7,500 years ago, when Ovid's narration ends. That indicates that the Black Sea Deluge happened faster than anticipated and by 7,500 years ago it was over (also confirmed by Ballard et al - so fresh water mollusks are found past this timeline). 


Why is this detail so important? 

It establishes how long ago Noah's Flood ended. Many cities are underwater. This includes Alexandria, not just the Black Sea cities (which might have been flooded later, this is why establishing an accurate timeline is important). 


The most important question - ''Do we have a reliable source for all those events?''

The answer is ABSOLUTELY NO. 

We don't even have an accurate source for events that happened 1,700 years ago (see Constatine and Crispus entries - we have ZERO evidence about the story). 

History was intentionally falsified for gains (they ''took'' everything that belonged to the rightful owners).

 

 







Popular posts from this blog

The mark of the beast - how they faked history to make it look like a prophecy for the future

Secret symbolism in iconography

An accurate timeline of the most plausible scenario with the BEAST