Slavic and Asian invasions into Europe

Slavic tribes began settling in the territory of modern-day Ukraine after the 4th century CE

Slavic migration to the Balkans primarily occurred during the 6th and 7th centuries, with the earliest waves beginning in the late 6th century CE. This means after year 550 CE.


The Hungarian people migrated to the Carpathian Basin, which includes present-day Hungary, in the late 9th century CE, specifically around 895-907 CE. They are currently heavily admixed with Europeans.


The first significant appearance of Turks in Europe, in terms of a large-scale migration and the establishment of a lasting presence, was with the Ottoman Turks in the 14th century

The Ottomans ended the Byzantine Empire with the conquest of Constantinople in 1453.


Does anyone really believe there were NO location names BEFORE these arrivals?  Particularly that there is EVIDENCE of scripts, culture and civilisation which far predate any of these populations (the cradle of civilisation is Romania). 

Cucuteni and Vinca civilisations are on Dacia/Romania's former territories. 

Most toponyms are from the old European language. 


Also, reminder. DACIA/ ROMANIA is called ROMANIA. 

Italy is NOT and was never called ROMANIA, nor do they call themselves ROMANS or ROMANIANS. The real Roman Empire comes from ROMANIA (so does Egypt and yes, there is evidence to support this, Egyptian DNA is from the area and they spoke old Romanian = old European). 

Do you know who else calls themselves ROMAN ? Germans. GE RA MAN > German. 

They also call themselves DACI > DEUTCH. Just like Dutch (pronounced exactly like DACI). 


To put things into better perspective, Sub Saharan DNA appeared in Egypt in the past 2,300 years. Even the name Sahara comes from Saka Ra. Saka = Orion and Saxons. Their presence in Egypt is attested in inscriptions and DNA. 

Saka > Sah = Orion. So Sahara means Orion Ra, or Matria, linked to Saka > Saxons. 

It explains the presence of many Germanic words in Egyptian, which was a Romance language. its closest modern relative is Romanian. 


Sare/Asare/Osiris/Caesar could not have waged war against his own people :))) 

Plus, he ''lived'' 7,500 years ago (he is a dead one, and the busts presented as him are fake. That is a nobody. That is NOT Asare!).

 What is strange, they faked Lucifer's appearance, too. That is J god.

 






Popular posts from this blog

The mark of the beast - how they faked history to make it look like a prophecy for the future

Secret symbolism in iconography

An accurate timeline of the most plausible scenario with the BEAST