Significant ghost DNA found in sub-saharan populations

 With so many mistakes and false claims, one must be very careful about data interpretation. 


However, this indicates different species of ''hominid'' contributed to sub saharan DNA. 

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/some-west-africans-may-have-dna-genes-ancient-ghost-hominid

https://www.livescience.com/ancient-dna-sub-saharan-africa.html

Inrerestingc claim, if true:

''The ancestors of all modern humans split off from a mystery population 1.5 million years ago and then reconnected with them 300,000 years ago, a new genetic model suggests. The unknown population contributed 20% of our DNA and may have boosted humans' brain function.''

 

 https://www.aip.org/inside-science/genetic-traces-of-mysterious-human-lineage-detected-in-people-living-in-west-africa

 

 

 But here is a TRUE fact: Sub saharans appeared as species quite recently (for sure under 12k years  and fortunately,thee is old historical data that indicates this). The whole OOA is a huge scam (I am sure other recent ones, linked with a V are familiar, and many others come to mind). 

 Truth: Sub sajaran DNA is detected in Europe around Anno Mundi 1 (c 6kya). Europeans have no genetic affinity with them, REGARDLESS how far back in time one goes. 

That is because they are different species

It is enough to see when YDNA E or a sub saharan mtDNA is first detected in  Europe ...and then all the false claims fail. Anno Mundi 1 is the true timeline of the first OOA. 








Popular posts from this blog

Secret symbolism in iconography

MATRIA ATENA

Venus --XX -- ♀ -- the Symbol of Life