The Enlightenment + Romantic eras and astrology
Beginning: 18.16 degrees =>>> 0° + 18 degrees.
End: 22.35 degrees
Betelgeuse 19° Gemini
Sirius 4° Cancer
Beginning: 23.53 degrees =>>> 0° + almost 24 degrees
End: 25.35 degrees
Betelgeuse 24°Gem
Sirius 9° Cancer
Romantic Era (1790 - 1850), RA MAN = Orion conj Cancer
Beginning: 25.00 degrees =>>> 0° + 25 degrees
End: 25.84 degrees
Bellatrix 18° Gemini
Betelgeuse 25° Gemini
Sirius 11° Cancer
For year 1 CE:
Bellatrix - 23° TaurusBeltegeuse - 0°57'3 Gemini
Sirius - 16° Gemini
...........................
Enlightenment: 1685 – 1800 ( rounded to 1700 / 71.6 = c. 23° -24° of precession from year 1 - it wuuld correspond to Sirius). Romantic era: 1798 – 1850 (c. 25° of precession from year 1 CE. If Bellatrix = 0 Gemini, then Sirius is around 24 Gemini).
Renaissance 1300 - 1600 (c. 18° of precession from year 1 CE)
Enlightenment = RA MANAT > RAMANA > ''lumina'' (light) = Orion + Manat (> ment) = Orion conjunct Moon/Cancer.
Romantic = RA MAN = Orion conjunct Moon/Cancer
Where was Bellatrix at the time? Or Orion, generally speaking.
Bellatrix is now at Gemini 21.
Betelgeuse is at Gemini 29.
Meissa is Bellatrix + c. 3 degrees = around Gemini 24.
1 degree of precession = 71.6 years (25,772/360).
2025 - 1685 = 340
340/71.6 = 4.75...so over 4 degrees of precession ago, but under 5.
21 - 4 = 17 (or over 16).
So Bellatrix was at 16 - 17 Gemini.
If we calculate from Gemini 0 (and not 3 - which is to align aspects with the ECAT of Matria Esh), then we have Bellatrix + 17 = ''Crea Patra'' (turned into ''Cleopatra'') or ''St Peter'' - for the fixed zodiac (unmovable degree, it is not linked to precession).
What zodiac sign starts at Gemini 17 - 18 for Terra? MANAT > MANA > MAN = MOON, the ruler of Cancer.
Cancer is conjunct Aesir (which includes star Sirius) and is 42 degrees (the 42 body parts of Asare/Sare/Caesar/Osiris).
We are told Cleopatra (Crea patra, the birth of 4, meaning the 4th zodiac sign = Cancer) lived 39 years = degrees. This is 3 degrees less than the original 42 degrees that appear at Gobekli Tepe.
''Cleopatra'' is Matria as the zodiac sign of Cancer. Minus the crazy, fake history.
Speaking of Rosetta Stone - from RE SET/Seth.
Re/Ra/Ria/Rhea = Orion.
Set, like Sare/Asare/Osiris/Caesar = Ptah/PAT, Apis bull, Aesir (star Sirius).
RE SET + the symbol that is everywhere (A phallic symbol) = Orion conjunct Cancer.
Re SET > Ro+setta (sata = snake in Egyptian).
Egyptians never called their country Aegyptos (Aegyptus) - from KA PTAH, for TA MARI = MARY's LAND = MARY LAND.
Ptah = Set/Seth/Sata/Satesh, the snake of Cancer.
1700 - 1860 - the timeline when the history of Egypt = Rome = Greece (they were one and the same civilisation before fall) was dug up ..and also FALSIFIED. The current inhabitants of Egypt, Italy and Greece are not the native population that built the old civilisation.
1700 - 1860 = that is when the ruins of the OLD CIVILISATION were dug up.
https://m4tri4.blogspot.com/2025/11/old-civilisation-photos.html
It is insulting that most attribute civilisation to others (including the ''Tartaria'' nonsense). They HAVE the name of the person who invented/created all aspects of civilisation - MATRIA ATENA. This name appears in myths in Egypt (Ta Meri > Mary, from Matria), Rome and Grece (all goddesses minus Aphrodite = the current Age of Pisces), India (Mount Meru), the Basque - Mari, Chinese MU LAO HU (Mother Tigress of the West, MAT > MU, RA > LAO, HAT=8 > HU), Japanese Amaterasu.
Matria or MAT = mother in all European languages, in the sense of CREATRIX of Light and civilisation.
E RA KA TRITY (Ra KA 30) (see Dendera zodiac).
E LE C TRITY
E LE C TRICI TY > Electricity, from RA, MATRIA.
MOTOR, from MATRIA.
KA MAT > che+mia, chemistry.
It is absolutely bizarre to attribute the old civilisation to Tartaria.
The very word “Tartary” in old European maps was already a half-fictional, half-pejorative term for the vast steppe zone east of the Urals --the traditional natural boundary separating Europe and Asia. Medieval and early-modern writers deliberately linked it to Tartarus (the classical Greek underworld, the deepest pit of Hell) because the Mongol/Tatar invasions of the 13th century (sacking Kiev 1240, devastating Hungary and Poland 1241, reaching the gates of Vienna) were seen as an apocalyptic scourge. Chroniclers literally called them “the scourge of God” and “demons from Tartarus.”
So the irony is brutal:
- Real historical Tatars/Mongols burned, looted, and depopulated huge parts of eastern and central Europe.
- They left almost no permanent stone architecture in the areas they conquered in Europe (their capitals were in the steppe: Sarai, Karakorum, etc.).
- When they did build, it was in Central Asia or China, and they happily put their own names on it (e.g., Batu Khan, Ögedei, etc.).
And now some channels want us to believe these same horsemen who torched libraries and cities secretly built St. Petersburg, the U.S. Capitol, and every neoclassical train station in Europe… then erased every trace of their own existence and went back to yurts without telling anyone.
It’s not just ahistorical; it’s the exact inversion of what actually happened. The Tatars were the destroyers in 1241, not the master builders of 1741.
So yes: Tartarus → Tartary → Tartaria nonsense is linguistically, historically, and morally upside-down. You couldn’t invent a more perfect example of history being stood on its head. Keep calling it out; every time someone looks at an actual 13th-century source or a Piranesi etching from 1765, the whole fantasy evaporates.
There are oral myths about this topic, so this is NOT fiction!
For long, I refrained from saying anything, as the Tartars I know are really nice people and they do not make such claims. Others attrbute the old civilisation to them. This is getting really unfair to the one who actually worked really hard and offered civilisation to everyone FOR FREE (and men still wanted to kill Her and steal everything from Her and/or worship the traitors who tried that).
Update:
The Renaissance was a European cultural movement (c. 1300–1600) marking the shift from the Middle Ages to modernity, centered in Italy but spreading across Europe, characterized by a "rebirth" of classical art, philosophy, and science.
Some historians give the time period known as the Renaissance between 1300 to 1600, others 1350 to 1600 and still others 1400 to 1600.
"Rebirth" of classical art, philosophy, and science: The term "Renaissance" (French for "rebirth") directly refers to the revival of ancient Greek and Roman (classical) learning, art, literature, philosophy, and scientific inquiry, often called humanism.
IT IS RE BIRTH = THE BIRTH OF RA = Orion conjunct Gemini 0 (for Terra) + 1300 years = a bit over 18 degrees of precession (1 degree = 71.6 years, number derived from 25772/360)).
This matches the Birth of RA (Terra's Sun in this case) at Gobekli Tepe, pillar 43 - the SUN = the HEAD on Aquila's wing.
The HEAD = SUN under the knees/legs of Orion (Narmer Palette and GT's headless man) = the BIRTH OF RA.
So, Renaissance = the BIRTH OF RA, Orion conjunct c. Gemini 18 (1300 CE / 71,6)
Then ROMANTIC period = RA MAN = Orion conjunct Cancer (but the extended version of 42 degrees, starting from about Gemini 25 (c. 1800 / 71.6)
Why the slight variations? Because it is not an exact degree, it is a bit off and it could be 1 degree BEFORE the perfection of the aspect (applying aspects are viewed as strongest in astrology).
Also, there is no consensus when the exact moment started (obviously! A lot of events happening around a timeline, which lead to ''the birth of RA'' = Renaissance, then the Enlightenment (which must also be calculated in degrees of precession) and Romatic eras.
This is about astrology used to depict major historical events.
